End of lifeInternet Explorer reached End of lifeThe vendor no longer ships security fixes. Remove or isolate the product instead of waiting for a patch. on 15 Jun 2022. No patch is coming: remove or isolate it.
SummaryAI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. Generated 23 Oct 2026.
The flaw lies in the Microsoft.XMLDOM ActiveX control in Microsoft Internet Explorer, affecting Microsoft Windows 8.1 and earlier. An attacker who can get a victim to load a crafted page over the network can learn local pathnames, UNC share pathnames, and intranet hostnames and IP addresses by reading the error codes the control returns, with no authentication or user interaction required beyond the page load.
Official description · NVDSource dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. Copied from NVD.
The Microsoft.XMLDOM ActiveX control in Microsoft Windows 8.1 and earlier allows remote attackers to determine the existence of local pathnames, UNC share pathnames, intranet hostnames, and intranet IP addresses by examining error codes, as demonstrated by a res:// URL, and exploited in the wild in February 2014.
Priority scorePatchfirst’s 0 to 100 ranking. It adds points for CISA KEV listing, ransomware use, EPSS, threat reports, public exploit code and CVSS. Every CVE page shows the breakdown.Breakdown
68.5 / 100
Exploited
Yes, in CISA KEV
Reports
2
Tactics
1/15
How an attack unfolds
Based on MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. mappings. Select a step to see the evidence.
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
First seen exploited the day it was disclosed. Public exploit code (Metasploit) appeared 6 months after disclosure.
CISA KEV listing is when exploitation was confirmed, not necessarily the first attack.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
1 TechniqueOne specific attacker behaviour in MITRE ATT&CK, such as T1190 “Exploit Public-Facing Application”. IDs with a dot, like T1059.004, are sub-techniques., grouped by TacticThe attacker’s goal at a stage of an attack in MITRE ATT&CK, such as Initial Access or Persistence. Each technique belongs to one or more tactics. in kill-chain order, 2 cited passagesAIAI-writtenWritten by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person.1
ReconnaissanceTA0043
Gather Victim Host InformationT1592Medium Confidence (technique links)How sure Patchfirst is that an ATT&CK technique applies to this CVE. High and medium links are shown by default; low ones come from early or generic mappings, text matching, or contradict the CVE’s details.
AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. claude-haiku-5-5: Reveals host and network environment information.AI mapping from the description · primary impact
Reveals host and network environment information
determine the existence of local pathnames, UNC share pathnames, intranet hostnames
These come from early or generic mappings, text matching, or contradict this CVE’s details (for example a public-facing technique on a bug that needs a user to open a file). Shown for completeness.
Drive-by CompromiseT1189AIAI-writtenWritten by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. claude-haiku-5-5: Drive-by via browser ActiveX control; remote web delivery.server-side bug exploitable without user interaction; client-execution technique does not fit
What security researchers reported
Named in 2 threat reportsMachineMachine-matchedFound by keyword or pattern matching over threat-report text. Not reviewed by a person. Exact CVE id found in the report text.
2 reportsMicrosoft2
Reports are matched by finding the exact id CVE-2013-7331 in their text; nobody has reviewed the match. One passage is shown per report, at most 320 characters, linked to the original.
…a spear phishing email message.1 The document, when opened, used an embedded ActiveX control to download a JavaScript file from a remote site that used a previously unknown vulnerability in some versions of Windows (later designated CVE-2013-7331) to read information about the browser’s installed…
…exploits targeting CVE-2013-2551, a use-after-free vulnerability in versions 6 through 10 of Internet Explorer, accounted for the largest share of browser-related exploit encounters in 2H14, then fell to negligible levels in 1H15 as exploit kit authors dropped them in favor of exploits targeting CVE-2013-7331.