SummaryAI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. Generated 29 Oct 2026.
The flaw is a use of externally-controlled format string in Fortinet's multiple products, affecting FortiOS, FortiProxy, FortiPAM, and FortiSwitchManager across the version ranges listed in the advisory. An attacker who sends specially crafted packets to an affected system can execute unauthorized code or commands, with the attack requiring no authentication or user interaction and only network reachability to the device.
Official description · NVDSource dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. Copied from NVD.
A use of externally-controlled format string in Fortinet FortiOS versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.6, 7.0.0 through 7.0.13, FortiProxy versions 7.4.0 through 7.4.2, 7.2.0 through 7.2.8, 7.0.0 through 7.0.14, FortiPAM versions 1.2.0, 1.1.0 through 1.1.2, 1.0.0 through 1.0.3, FortiSwitchManager versions 7.2.0 through 7.2.3, 7.0.0 through 7.0.3 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets.
Priority scorePatchfirst’s 0 to 100 ranking. It adds points for CISA KEV listing, ransomware use, EPSS, threat reports, public exploit code and CVSS. Every CVE page shows the breakdown.Breakdown
73.6 / 100
Exploited
Yes, in CISA KEV
Reports
1
Tactics
2/15
How an attack unfolds
Based on MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. mappings. Select a step to see the evidence.
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
First seen exploited 8 months after disclosure. Public exploit code (PoC-in-GitHub) appeared 8 months after disclosure.
CISA KEV listing is when exploitation was confirmed, not necessarily the first attack.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
2 TechniqueOne specific attacker behaviour in MITRE ATT&CK, such as T1190 “Exploit Public-Facing Application”. IDs with a dot, like T1059.004, are sub-techniques., grouped by TacticThe attacker’s goal at a stage of an attack in MITRE ATT&CK, such as Initial Access or Persistence. Each technique belongs to one or more tactics. in kill-chain order, 2 cited passagesAIAI-writtenWritten by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person.2
Initial AccessTA0001
Exploit Public-Facing ApplicationT1190Medium Confidence (technique links)How sure Patchfirst is that an ATT&CK technique applies to this CVE. High and medium links are shown by default; low ones come from early or generic mappings, text matching, or contradict the CVE’s details.
AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. claude-haiku-5-5: Network-exploitable via crafted packets to public-facing devices.AI mapping from the description · how it is exploited
Network-exploitable via crafted packets to public-facing devices
allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets
Command and Scripting InterpreterT1059Medium Confidence (technique links)How sure Patchfirst is that an ATT&CK technique applies to this CVE. High and medium links are shown by default; low ones come from early or generic mappings, text matching, or contradict the CVE’s details.
AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. claude-haiku-5-5: Format string flaw yields unauthorized code execution.AI mapping from the description · primary impact
Format string flaw yields unauthorized code execution
allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets
0 rules for this CVE · 244 general rules for its techniques
Rules for this CVE
0Sigma ruleAn open, vendor-neutral detection rule for log data. Security teams convert Sigma rules into searches for their own SIEM. that reference CVE-2024-23113 directly.
CVE-specific rules are not available in this build. Search SigmaHQ ↗
General rules for this CVE’s techniques
These detect the technique in general, not this specific vulnerability.
Named in 1 threat reportMachineMachine-matchedFound by keyword or pattern matching over threat-report text. Not reviewed by a person. Exact CVE id found in the report text.
1 reportctrlaltintel.comMar 2026
Reports are matched by finding the exact id CVE-2024-23113 in their text; nobody has reviewed the match. One passage is shown per report, at most 320 characters, linked to the original.
We observed the threat actor target multiple Fortinet related CVEs (CVE-2024-55591, CVE-2024-23113 & CVE-2022-42475) in attempts to gain command execution on Edge devices.