Ivanti · Connect Secure, Policy Secure, and ZTA Gateways
SummaryAI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. Generated 23 Oct 2026.
A stack-based buffer overflow in Ivanti Connect Secure, Ivanti Policy Secure, and Ivanti Neurons for ZTA gateways allows the flaw to be triggered in these products' remote-facing components. A remote attacker who needs no authentication, no user interaction, and only network access to the gateway can achieve remote code execution, though the attack is considered high complexity.
Official description · NVDSource dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. Copied from NVD.
A stack-based buffer overflow in Ivanti Connect Secure before version 22.7R2.5, Ivanti Policy Secure before version 22.7R1.2, and Ivanti Neurons for ZTA gateways before version 22.7R2.3 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to achieve remote code execution.
Priority scorePatchfirst’s 0 to 100 ranking. It adds points for CISA KEV listing, ransomware use, EPSS, threat reports, public exploit code and CVSS. Every CVE page shows the breakdown.Breakdown
85.4 / 100
Exploited
Yes, in CISA KEV
Reports
2
Tactics
6/15
How an attack unfolds
Based on MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. mappings. Select a step to see the evidence.
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
First seen exploited the day it was disclosed. Public exploit code (PoC-in-GitHub) appeared 3 days after disclosure.
CISA KEV listing is when exploitation was confirmed, not necessarily the first attack.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
6 TechniqueOne specific attacker behaviour in MITRE ATT&CK, such as T1190 “Exploit Public-Facing Application”. IDs with a dot, like T1059.004, are sub-techniques., grouped by TacticThe attacker’s goal at a stage of an attack in MITRE ATT&CK, such as Initial Access or Persistence. Each technique belongs to one or more tactics. in kill-chain orderSourceSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset.6
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · how it is exploited
This vulnerability in Ivanti products is version-specific, requiring any reconaissance efforts to return the exact version before exploiting. If exploited, attackers may gain the ability to execute arbitrary code and harvest credentials from the compromised device. Additionally, they may perform internal reconaissance to find additional devices on the network to compromise.
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · how it is exploited
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · primary impact
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · primary impact
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · follow-on activity
Source dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. CTID Mappings Explorer KEV 07/28/2025 (ATT&CK 16.1); capability: Buffer Overflow.MITRE CTID mapping of the KEV entry · follow-on activity
Detection
0 rules for this CVE · 263 general rules for its techniques
Rules for this CVE
0Sigma ruleAn open, vendor-neutral detection rule for log data. Security teams convert Sigma rules into searches for their own SIEM. that reference CVE-2025-0282 directly.
CVE-specific rules are not available in this build. Search SigmaHQ ↗
General rules for this CVE’s techniques
These detect the technique in general, not this specific vulnerability.
Named in 2 threat reportsMachineMachine-matchedFound by keyword or pattern matching over threat-report text. Not reviewed by a person. Exact CVE id found in the report text.
2 reportsGoogle Mandiantblogs.jpcert.or.jp
Reports are matched by finding the exact id CVE-2025-0282 in their text; nobody has reviewed the match. One passage is shown per report, at most 320 characters, linked to the original.
CVE-2025-0282 is a buffer overflow vulnerability caused by the strncpy function, and the malware dynamically fixes it by hooking the strncpy function and limiting the copy size to 256.