Ruby SAML vulnerable to SAML authentication bypass due to namespace handling (parser differential)
SAML-Toolkits · ruby-saml
SummaryAI-written · claude-haiku-5-5AI-written · claude-haiku-5-5Written by a language model from the source data on this page. Not reviewed by a person. Generated 29 Oct 2026.
A parser differential in ruby-saml's handling of XML namespaces lets ReXML and Nokogiri build different document structures from the same SAML input, enabling signature validation to check one element while authentication reads another. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can exploit this without user interaction or prior authentication to perform a Signature Wrapping attack and bypass authentication.
Official description · CVE.orgSource dataSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. Copied from CVE.org.
ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. An authentication bypass vulnerability was found in ruby-saml prior to versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 due to a parser differential. ReXML and Nokogiri parse XML differently, the parsers can generate entirely different document structures from the same XML input. That allows an attacker to be able to execute a Signature Wrapping attack. This issue may lead to authentication bypass. Versions 1.12.4 and 1.18.0 contain a patch for the issue.
Priority scorePatchfirst’s 0 to 100 ranking. It adds points for CISA KEV listing, ransomware use, EPSS, threat reports, public exploit code and CVSS. Every CVE page shows the breakdown.Breakdown
26.4 / 100
Exploited
Not confirmed
Reports
0
Tactics
0/15
Exploitation timelineDated milestones for a CVE: when it was disclosed, when exploit code became public, when exploitation was confirmed, and when threat reports named it.
Disclosed on 12 Mar 2025. No public exploit code or confirmed exploitation is recorded.
Patch historyEarlier and later CVEs in the same code, in date order. It shows when a fix was bypassed or incomplete and which version finally fixed it.
A fix was bypassed or incomplete once over 15 months. The latest fix listed for ruby-saml is 1.18.0.
Same bug familyLinked by evidence that a fix failed or the same code was patched again. Oldest first.
CVE-2024-45409The Ruby SAML library vulnerable to a SAML authentication bypass…10 Sep 2024
relatedHigh
Why these are linked: Link confidenceHow strong the evidence is that two CVEs are related. High: stated in the CVE text or linked in an advisory, or the same code was patched one release apart. Medium: the same code, or a version step plus a similar description. Low: similar description only.
Fixed one release later1.12.3 → 1.12.4 (ruby-saml)
CVE-2025-25291ruby-saml vulnerable to SAML authentication bypass due to…12 Mar 2025
same family
This CVECVE-2025-25292Ruby SAML vulnerable to SAML authentication bypass due to…12 Mar 2025
relatedMedium
Why these are linked: Link confidenceHow strong the evidence is that two CVEs are related. High: stated in the CVE text or linked in an advisory, or the same code was patched one release apart. Medium: the same code, or a version step plus a similar description. Low: similar description only.
CVE-2025-25293ruby-saml vulnerable to Remote Denial of Service (DoS) with…12 Mar 2025
relatedMedium
Why these are linked: Link confidenceHow strong the evidence is that two CVEs are related. High: stated in the CVE text or linked in an advisory, or the same code was patched one release apart. Medium: the same code, or a version step plus a similar description. Low: similar description only.
CVE-2025-66567ruby-saml has a SAML authentication bypass due to namespace…9 Dec 2025
relatedMedium
Why these are linked: Link confidenceHow strong the evidence is that two CVEs are related. High: stated in the CVE text or linked in an advisory, or the same code was patched one release apart. Medium: the same code, or a version step plus a similar description. Low: similar description only.
MITRE ATT&CKA public catalogue of the techniques attackers use, maintained by MITRE. Patchfirst uses it to describe what attackers do with a vulnerability. techniques
No techniques linked
No ATT&CK techniques are linked to this CVE yet. MITRE CTID has not mapped it, and no report passage in the corpus ties it to a technique.
Am I affected? What do I upgrade to?
From GitHub Security Advisories and OSVSourceSource dataCopied from an authoritative feed: NVD, CVE.org, CISA KEV, FIRST EPSS or MITRE CTID mappings, or labelled by the annotators of a published dataset. GitHub Security Advisories and OSV.
1 package in 1 ecosystem. Main package: ruby-saml.